Theme – Teach (#2) how to close player down from front. Coaches who have not developed good match analysis skills will struggle to derive value from CIG sessions. The teaching points or themes are based on the coach’s analysis of a past match or other match analysis observations. Match Analysis Skills : To maximize the benefit of CIG, a coach should focus on very specific patterns or teaching points. Coaches who have not watched a lot of soccer will struggle with this technique.Ĥ. Experience : Coaches using CIG methodology must have a good picture of what they want to get out of the session. The numbers involved are generally six versus six through eleven versus eleven.ģ. Management : CIG methodology is demanding on a coach’s ability to manage large numbers of players on the field at the same time. Is generally used for about 10-20 minutes and is rarely used for a full practice.Ģ.CIG frequently is used at the culmination of a practice to reinforce the theme(s) of practice or highlight an issue from a past or previous game.This method of coaching is appropriate for older players (12 + years of age).It requires a coach who understands when, where and how it is best utilized: Knowledge – CIG is an advanced teaching technique. The scenarios require different techniques and tactical processes although they are both one versus one scenarios.ġ. In this case the (#8) must try and close the back down quickly before (#4) can turn without fouling her and without exposing herself by over-committing herself should (#4) play a quick combination with (#8). In Figure 2, a central midfielder (#8) is closing down a player who is receiving the ball from a center back (#5) and is, probably, facing the wrong direction. The (#2) will be closing a player down who is facing him and able to run at him with the ball. Coaching in the Game configuration tests a coach’s understanding of not only the techniques and tactics of one versus one situations but also where the dozens of varieties of one versus one actually fits into a real game.įigure 1, shows a right back (#2) closing down the left attacking flank player (#11), who has received a ball from a central defender (#5). In either case, players must make decisions and execute techniques in relation to other attacking and defending players in the area of the field where they operate and within the overall defending philosophy of the team. Additionally, the defensive demands on an outside fullback in one versus one are different than the demands on a central midfielder. But many of our coaches are clearly not quite sure where it fits into a game. Many of our coaches are comfortable with teaching one versus one in a grid (with two small goals, etc.) and understand the progression and succession of coaching points in one versus one exercises. Often times, however, we feel as though many of us are not entirely sure where the part of the Whole-Part-Whole formula fits into the real game.įor example, an exercise used extensively is one versus one. The German, Whole-Part-Whole, coaching methodology was introduced to the U.S.A by Dettmar Cramer in the early 1970’s. The CIG session is the ultimate test of a coach’s knowledge and expertise as it tests an individual’s ability to analyze the game and addresses very specific areas, areas which are directly related to the actual game and the needs of the players within the game. coned areas, limits on touches, uneven numbers in certain areas of the field, etc.). Simply put Coaching in the Game (CIG) involves coaching players in an even sided game with limited or no artificial teaching conditions (e.g.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |